Introduction

When engineers design geothermal energy systems, they are essentially figuring out how to move heat from underground reservoirs of hot rock, soil, or water up to the surface, where it can be used to generate electricity or provide direct heating. The thermal conductivity of underground materials determines how effectively this heat can move through the Earth to reach wells, pipes, or heat exchangers.

High-conductivity sites are better for electricity generation (where high temperatures and steady heat flow are required). Moderate or low-conductivity sites may be more suitable for direct-use systems, like heating buildings or greenhouses, where lower but steady temperatures are sufficient.
Thermal conductivity is a key factor in determining how much heat can be harvested, how quickly it can be replenished, and how long a geothermal resource will remain viable. Without this knowledge, engineers risk designing systems that either underperform or deplete the geothermal resource too soon.

Materials

Write a Hypothesis

In today’s lab, your group will be testing the thermal conductivity of a material provided by your teacher by measuring the temperature over time as it is exposed to a heat source. Look at the materials list and identify the variables.

Identify the independent variable


Identify the dependent variable


Identify the constant variables





In comparison to the other materials being tested by your classmates, will your material have high or low thermal conductivity? Write a hypothesis and explain your reasoning.










Safety Guidelines

Before starting the lab experiment, review these safety guidelines.

  1. Hot plates and trays/beakers get HOT. Wear safety glasses and heat-resistant gloves when handling equipment. 
  2. Keep liquids away from electrical cords and hot plate controls. 
  3. DO NOT set thermometer probes directly on the hot plate surface.

Set Up

  1. Add and level a 5 cm layer of your material in your tray or beaker, and gently compress to a consistent packing. 
  2. Place your container on the hot plate, but do not turn it on yet.
  3. Use a ruler to mark probe depth 1 cm (near the bottom). Insert Probe A 1 cm above the bottom (close to the heat source). Insert Probe B 0.5 cm below the surface. Keep both probes centered and not touching the container walls or bottom. 
  4. Record the initial temperatures of both probes before heating in the data table below. 
  5. Unplug the hot plate and let materials cool before disposal and clean up.

Procedure

  1. Place the container on the hot plate set to LOW. 
  2. Start the timer. 
  3. Record both probe temperatures every two minutes for 20 minutes. 
  4. Do not stir or move the probes during the run. 

Data Table

Identify your test material: 
TimeProbe A (near bottom) TemperatureProbe B (near top) Temperature
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20

Graphing

Analysis and Conclusion Questions

  1. Share the rate of heat transfer for your material according to teacher instructions. Your teacher will direct you to where the rate of heat transfer data from all groups is displayed. Using that data, rank all the materials tested in order from fastest to slowest heat transfer.









  1. What properties of the materials (e.g., density, moisture, composition) may influence thermal conductivity? 









  1. Based on class data, does your material have high, moderate, or low thermal conductivity? 









  1. Was your hypothesis supported by the data? Why or why not? 









  1. What specific sources of measurement error may have affected your results (for example: timing, temperature readings, or material thickness)? How might repeating the experiment with more trials help reduce the impact of these errors and increase confidence in your conclusions?









  1. Why would engineers want to know the thermal conductivity of underground materials before designing a geothermal system? 









  1. In a geothermal power plant, what problems might occur if the reservoir material has low thermal conductivity? 









  1. Imagine the material that you tested represented the subsurface beneath a geothermal well. How might the heat extraction strategy need to change for long-term efficiency? 









  1. If two geothermal sites have the same temperature, but one has high-conductivity granite and the other has low-conductivity clay, which would be better for electricity generation? Why?









  1. How does this experiment help explain in part why geothermal energy is more successful in some regions (like Iceland) than in others?









Assessment Rubric

CategoryExceeds ExpectationsMeets ExpectationsNeeds Improvement
Safety and ProceduresConsistently follows all safety rules and sets up/uses equipment correctly without reminders.Follows most safety rules and sets up/uses equipment mostly correctly; may need an occasional reminder.Often forgets safety rules or sets up equipment incorrectly; unsafe or unreliable procedure.
Data Collection and OrganizationThe data table is complete, accurate, and neatly organized at all time intervals.Most data has been collected correctly; the data table is mostly clear and organized.Many missing/inaccurate data points; the data table is incomplete/
disorganized.
Analysis and InterpretationClearly explains Probe A vs. Probe B trends with correct reasoning; graphs are accurate and labeled.Describes trends with some correct reasoning; graphs may have minor errors.Little or incorrect explanation of trends; incomplete or missing analysis.
Hypothesis and ConclusionHypothesis is clear and based on material properties. Conclusion strongly supported by data, with discussion of errors/improvements.Hypothesis reasonable; conclusion somewhat supported by data; limited reflection on errors.Hypothesis vague or missing; conclusion unsupported or absent.
Connections and EngagementActively participates and makes strong, thoughtful connections to real-world geothermal applications.Participates and makes basic or general real-world connections.Rarely participates; no or inaccurate real-world connections.