Introduction
In this activity, you’ll take on the role of a stakeholder in a simulated town hall about a local decision related to nuclear energy. Your group will research, develop a position, and engage in a structured discussion with other community members to evaluate the risks, benefits, and trade-offs of a proposed action.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this simulation, you will be able to:
- Evaluate multiple perspectives on nuclear energy by analyzing stakeholder viewpoints and trade-offs.
- Develop and defend a structured, evidence-based argument based on your assigned stakeholder’s role and priorities.
- Collaborate and engage in respectful, civil discourse to explore complex community decisions.
- Reflect on how values, evidence, and identity influence real-world policy and science decisions.
Simulation Overview
You will:
- Be assigned to a stakeholder group (e.g., Local Resident, Nuclear Engineer, Health Official).
- Collaborate with your group to research or discuss what your stakeholder’s position might be.
- Use this handout to organize your evidence, concerns, and talking points.
- Participate in a moderated town hall discussion.
- Vote and reflect on your learning at the end of the activity.
Group Planning Sheet
Stakeholder Group:
Group Members:
1. What are your stakeholder’s top concerns?
2. What are the potential benefits of the proposal for your group?
3. Is your group in favor, opposed, or undecided about the proposal?
❑ In Favor ❑ Opposed ❑ Undecided
Explain why:
4. What evidence or examples will support your position?
| Source or Statistic | How it Helps Your Case |
|---|---|
5. What conditions (if any) would make your group more likely to support the proposal?
6. What might other stakeholders argue, and how will you respond?
| Opposing Argument | Your Rebuttal |
|---|---|
During the Town Hall
- Designate 1–2 spokespersons to present your group’s views.
- Listen actively and take notes during the discussion.
- Be respectful, stick to your role, and use evidence to support your statements.
Vote
After the discussion, cast your individual vote on the proposal:
❑ Support ❑ Oppose ❑ Undecided
Reflection
Answer the following after the town hall:
- What was your group’s stance? Explain why.
- Did any group make you reconsider your position? Why or why not?
- What was challenging about speaking for a role that may not match your personal opinion?
- How do you think real-life decisions about energy and the environment are influenced by stakeholder perspectives?
Assessment Rubric
| Criteria | Exceeds | Proficient | Developing | Needs Work |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Argument Quality | Strong claim with multiple, credible pieces of evidence | Clear claim and evidence | Some evidence, weak reasoning | Little to no evidence |
| Perspective Representation | Deeply understood stakeholder goals and tradeoffs | Good understanding | Partial understanding | Confused or inconsistent |
| Collaboration and Discourse | Respectful and built on others’ ideas | Participated respectfully | Minimal or off-topic contribution | Disruptive or absent |
| Reflection | Deep insight, personal reflection, clear connection to evidence | Thorough summary | Basic thoughts | Vague or missing |